tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4528393111359731672.post2519608849278372233..comments2024-03-24T00:19:53.054+00:00Comments on Green All Over: Playing The PercentagesCassinihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05879449876804295094noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4528393111359731672.post-10585368519675127492011-03-16T14:01:14.208+00:002011-03-16T14:01:14.208+00:00And re: the table issue - just convert the table t...And re: the table issue - just convert the table to a jpeg and upload it like you do with any other graphic.Jamiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08413733902099555067noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4528393111359731672.post-37248106943977851462011-03-16T13:53:40.654+00:002011-03-16T13:53:40.654+00:00No arguments there mate... though
The analogy had...No arguments there mate... though<br /><br />The analogy had less to do with online poker than with playing poker with competitors under what I would call my optimum playing field... <br /><br />If I'm playing with 10 mates and a $10 buy in, I play a lot differently that I do when I am playing at a casino tournament with a $2,00 buy in and 100 people to get through.<br /><br />I personally found the low stakes games were instilling bad habits in me, so I ditched them. I've found the same with trading. When I started trading the 2pm at Haydock with $5 backing and laying, I was quite happy to lose the lot. <br /><br />Now that I am putting 4 figures on the same sort of trades, I find my entry and exit points and rationale for trading completely different... <br /><br />Anyway, thanks for the mention. I agree completely that paper / matchstick / low stakes trading is a blunt tool in the long term trader's arsenal (Go the Gunners ;-)<br /><br />JamieJamiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08413733902099555067noreply@blogger.com