Tuesday 31 January 2017


Courtesy of Megarain's latest post, I came across a story which may or may not be true, (there are a few inconsistencies in his tale) of someone who unexpectedly inherited Can$2.5million three and a half years ago, and now has:
$325,000 Canadian left. I have a $100,000 personal loan at 8% (yeah), a $51,000 credit card debt accruing at 19% per year and various debts ranging from 6 to 10%. Oh man I feel so dumb – I could have paid the car I am driving in cash, but somehow I ended up getting financing
In an attempt to win back some, all or more of his 'lost' money, he's shorting Apple, whose earnings come out today (Tuesday).

He's certainly convinced himself that Apple will disappoint the market, and needs the current price of $121.63 to dip below $120 to start making some money.
If Apple's stock price goes up, well...

Also concerning was the line:
Look, I’ll be blunt: I want my two point five million back. It’s mine and I want it back, period
Something tells me the poster hasn't yet accepted his losses. "It's mine"? No. It WAS yours, but not any more.

I concur with Megarain's anonymous commenter, who wrote: 
Interesting read. I have to say that the guy sounds like a bit of an idiot though.
' but if you do exist God: please, please, please, please, please help me. I have never been lucky in this life and you have thrown many obstacles in my way, but if you help me here, everything is forgiven.' --> writes the guy who inherited 2.5 mill from a random uncle.
I think even if the trade goes his way, he'll find a way to squander his winnings.
It's a very generous offer to god that he will forgive him, and of course god has nothing better to do today than fudge Apple's numbers to help this guy.

Apple's earnings are always of passing interest, but I'll be thinking of this story when I see the numbers today. On a day (Monday) when the NASDAQ dropped 0.83%, (thank you Mr Trump), that AAPL closed the day little changed from Friday may not be a good sign for our Canadian poster. We shall see.

One interesting piece of his post was his start in trading soon after inheriting his millions:
I wanted to trade. I had always wanted to trade and the world of day-trading seemed like a utopia to me. At first, I had success.
People might remember my big Apple bet a few years ago where I essentially made $30,000 in under a week.
Looking back at it today, much later, I regret winning that trade.
Perhaps if I had lost everything on that trade, it would have disgusted me from trading forever and I would still have much of that $2.5M today.
But I won, and I won for a good while, and it kept me going.
Then, I began to lose.
I've heard others say that the worst thing that happened to them was winning that first bet / trade. Be careful what you wish for.  

Monday 30 January 2017


Racing Victoria's Mark Constable appeared to be confused about 'delays' when trading tennis in-play writing:

I'm not sure what "the" statement refers to, both James and myself have made several statement, but yes we can agree that all in-play markets have a delay for entering new bets, typically five seconds but not always, but that fact is completely irrelevant to the topic that was being discussed, i.e. tennis trading and court-siders.  

It later transpired that what was "ridiculous" about this was that Mark doesn't actually know anything about tennis trading, as he tweeted in a reply to Betfair Pro Trader James :
I'm glad that's cleared up then. For a while there I was thinking that Mark had found a way to beat the court-sider advantage in tennis, which would have made for an interesting read. 

What did make for an interesting read was Betfair Pro Trader's latest post "It Doesn't Get Any Easier". Yours truly gets a mention or two...
As Cassini points out, trading tennis in-play is only for syndicates with court-siders plugged into algo-bots. Sitting at home with a delayed video feed will do little more than earn trading profits for the syndicates and subscription profits for the vendors.
... but there's a lot more to James' post including his thoughts on the financial markets and a utopian future:
The AI of the future, which creates efficient markets that are difficult to lose money in will probably be powerful enough to ensure that nobody needs for anything and there will be better things to do than risking money for gain. Maybe money itself will become obsolete. Until then, you have to hope that you are on the side of the informed and not the uninformed (or misinformed).

Of course, some sports exist solely as a conduit for gambling. Horse racing being the most prominent. There is nothing I can say that would console those who would mourn the loss of horse racing, but if given the choice I'd rather live in a world without want of food and shelter than one with a want for horse racing.
Deep stuff, and I fully concur with James' thoughts on horse racing. I used to enjoy the occasional day out at the races, and my daughter still loves her Royal Ascot, but for both of is, it's the social (ok, drinking) side of the day that appeals. That horses are running around is merely the excuse.

Tony Stephens, possibly his real name, finally found time to comment on my response to his question, writing:
Thank you for the detailed responses. I have been too busy to respond until now.
As you can imagine, there has been a massive uptake of my latest book as a result of some recent publicity. The warehouse has been shipping them out 24/7. At times I’ve been on the shop floor myself and giving the lads a hand. This has unfortunately taken me out of the trading arena so you may have found the markets to be a little thinner than usual.
Skimming through the musings I eventually found what I believe to be your answer: “..writing is fun . I enjoy it; it’s relaxing …and interesting.” So you could nearly fill a full line with this information.
What I did also find was quite a lot of supporting evidence that the older generation now have the basic concept of how to use a search engine. I must write to Which? Computing to congratulate them on the success of their campaign to raise computing standards for the silver surfers.
On a slightly more serious note, I would be wary of anyone that gives out information on sports trading unless you have absolute confidence about their motives, character and their real name.
That includes even me!
Yours in trading, Tony Stephens
That was actually quite a good response from Tony, and I feel rather mean now about my digs at West Ham. It's not as if I'm in a good place to tease others about their football team right now. When the book is ready, please ship me an advance (complimentary) copy from the back of the warehouse and I shall give it an honest and impartial review.

Finally, when I see Tweets on my timeline from the respected Joseph Buchdahl, there's usually an interesting article or topic to look at. 

After reading James' article John, possibly his real name, said:
interesting , although each " sport " a small % of elite will always ' win ' .So why not trading?
Joseph's response was spot on as usual:
Some readers may recall the name Daniel Kahneman from this blog, but I appear not to have mentioned his 2011 International Bestseller "Thinking, Fast and Slow" which sits on my bookshelf at home and which I can highly recommend.  

It's a fascinating read, with the Financial Times reviewer describing it as: "One of the greatest and most engaging collections of insights into the human mind I have read". 

Steven D Levitt of "Freakonomics" fame described the book as "a lifetime's worth of wisdom". 

I'm not sure if the Nobel Prize winner came up with the term "zero validity environment" perhaps f.k.a. a random walk, but it as where I first saw the term and as Joseph says, trading does fit the (near) zero validity environment. 

Paraphrasing Jason Kelly, author of "The 3% Signal":
What we learn from past experience can help us in future experiences. This is not so in the sports betting markets, where fluctuations follow no patterns precisely, despite what you might have heard.
The lessons you learned in the last event won’t necessarily help you in the next one. Experience in the sports betting markets doesn’t accumulate to create disciplinary wisdom the way it does in other walks of life. In fact, the very lessons we learn from past markets can lead us astray in future markets.
Anyone read The 3% Signal? Reviews as to its efficacy appear to be mixed.  

Saturday 28 January 2017

The Pimp Syndicate

It used to be a rarity that the daily hit count would exceed a thousand, but the past week has seen a huge uptick. Unfortunately the daily posts will be interrupted as I take another trip to Philadelphia, this time for a mid-Winter break which happens to coincide with the Superbowl.

James took a break from his new book "Reverse Portuguese Calculus" to ask about his latest best seller:
Am I writing this blog in my sleep or something?
Is the book any good, that's what Tony (and others) want to know.
I haven't finished it yet, but with a few hours of flying time coming up, I hope to have it completed by the time I return, but so far it hasn't disappointed. As you might expect if you read James's blog, it's targeted at the more discerning reader, and tells the truth as unpalatable as that might be to some people. 

James also replied to Prabhat's question from a couple of days ago, which I shall repeat here for clarity. Prabs wrote:
So are you saying that other than the information edge from knowing the game state earlier, there is no edge at all in sports betting?
Apologies if I'm getting you wrong, but from what you said that necessarily follows, since all the data is visible in pretty much every major sport.
Not agreeing or disagreeing for the moment, just trying to establish whether that's what you think.
I posted some thoughts of my own here, but James had a fuller reply, and is far more knowledgeable about tennis trading than I am:
As Cassini said more recently, it depends on the sport and the level of competition. You would think that Slams and high ranking point ATP/WTA tournaments are very closely watched by those in the know.
As I say, in another publication (available from independently reviewed booksellers), there are those who specialise at trading the lower level tennis tournaments and soccer leagues.
However, they must also factor in match fixing, which can eat into any informational edge they may have.
You could trade players outside of the top 100 in Challenger and Futures tennis tournaments but it only takes one or two bad eggs to throw matches and put a spanner in the works.
Personally, I am not a fundamental trader, just a technical trader. I have considered setting up a syndicate but it would need muscle as much as brains to run it. I know, from other income streams, that when you start to drain someone else's income stream they tend to plug the hole by putting a hole in you.
I was approached by someone wanting to set up a tennis trading syndicate. I did some research on him and discovered he was a convicted pimp. That's the sort of people you are dealing with.
No thank you.
The problem with setting up a tennis trading syndicate at this stage of the game, i.e. several years after the first syndicates started up, is that your competition is already in place with plenty of experience. In 2015, a BBC article reported:
Steve High says he has been told reliably that 75 people were at last year's Wimbledon final, "sending information back or betting on their own".
At some point, there's not enough money to go round. James mentions the more serious issue of match fixing, and the same BBC article has this to say:
Even supporters of tougher measures against courtsiders, like Chris Eaton director of sports integrity at the International Centre for Sports Security, thought the police had picked the wrong target.
"Courtsiding should be criminalised but the fact is it's a very minor issue compared to match-fixing and the corrupting of sports organisations in South-East Asia," he says.
European football is also mentioned in that BBC report, and if cricket is your sport of choice, in 2014 the Daily Telegraph reported:
The England and Wales Cricket Board released the fact that in summer 2013 there were 23 people ejected for what was believed to be courtsiding. 

Friday 27 January 2017

Road to the Warehouse - Poor House

Here's Tony A celebrating a West Ham United throw-in

It's an unusual career path to go from being a risk specialist with an investment bank to working in a warehouse, but life is full of surprises. 

Our contributor Tony, "The Only Way Is Essex", Stephens has trodden such a path, at least if one of his Twitter profiles is to be believed, and with a grand total of four (4) followers, perhaps it isn't. 

A second Tony Twitter account, this one not protected, is faring much better, almost twice as well in fact, with a total of seven (7) followers.

Here's the profile picture for that account:
Here's Tony B celebrating West Ham United winning a corner
Notice the similarity? 

It was also amusing to read that Tony's Skype Id was at one time "getintheir". Get in their what? Their face? Their way? Their washing? 

We'll never know. Probably he meant "getinthere" which would make more sense. Perhaps poor grammar is why the investment banking career didn't work out?

The quality of Tony's ideas about trading can be seen in this example:
Market prediction - if you think about maximising profits and minimising losses it almost doesn't matter if you guess up or down in terms of price prediction. However if you have some reasoning i.e. the fav has drifted then maybe the another horse is shortening then this might help predicting the movement correctly.
As little as I know about horses, I'm pretty sure that if the favourite has drifted, somewhere in the market, at least one other horse is shortening. 

"Maybe" ? Well these pesky betting exchanges can be tricky to understand, but as the proud owner of Caan Berry's horsey trading guide, you'd think such a basic market dynamic would have been covered.

As for admitting that you guess where prices might go, well good luck with that.

If you are serious about trading, I can strongly recommend Betfair Trading Techniques by Mr. James Butler.     

Thursday 26 January 2017

The Emperor And The Worm

A Tony Stephens commented. Now Tony Stephens is certainly not the rarest of names, but I do hope it's not the same Tony Stephens as the one above. 

"Just pick the winner whatever the price" is about as clueless a statement as you could find about betting, and as for not understanding the concept of betting exchanges, dear me. The basic idea is really quite simple, and it's being profitable that's more of a challenge. I'd suggest that anyone having trouble with understanding betting exchanges should probably stop right there.

And let's hope he's not the Tony Stephens below either:
Anyone working in a warehouse probably shouldn't be spending either his spare time or little money - that extra penny makes all the difference though...
...on gambling. 

Anyway, I'm sure it's another Tony Stephens who asked:
Could you explain why you like to blog about sports trading? If you know something that others don't why go through the "agro" of trying to prove it. If you manage to convince people you give away your edge or take mug money out of the market that you could exploit. If you don't convince people then you have wasted your time. Maybe hit counts help the ego more than realised profits?
A few points to address there, starting at the top - why do I like to blog about sports trading? 

For a start, writing is fun. I enjoy it; it's relaxing and writing about sports trading is particularly interesting in that there are so many topics, as evidenced by 2,238 posts in almost nine years, to write about. 

This blog is not solely about sports trading of course, as the heading makes clear:
...and related items of interest in the wide world of sports investing
That's a big world, and I write on other topics too as the mood takes me.

I'm not sure what Tony's next line is getting at:
If you know something that others don't why go through the "agro" of trying to prove it.
If the topic here is the recent one of how trading tennis from your home isn't a good idea, I'm presenting a logical explanation for why it's not a good idea. 

I'm trying to warn the vulnerable "warehouse workers" of this world, who might read somewhere that there is a fortune to be made, that in reality, trading tennis might not be the best idea for them. 

It's extraordinary claims that require extraordinary evidence, and the irresponsible claims of certain vendor bloggers that the novice tennis trader can simply jump into the Australian Open and make money is an extraordinary claim. 

I have yet to see any evidence to back that up, let alone extraordinary evidence. I'm simply saying the emperor has no clothes, and it's no "agro" to do so. 

I'm not a tennis trader, so pointing out what should be obvious doesn't hurt me at all. The interest that has been generated lately suggests my time hasn't been wasted. 
Seeing the hit counter climb is somewhat rewarding, but it means nothing in monetary terms. Writing for its own sake is a pleasure; that others read what I write is gratifying, but blogging is just a hobby.

Prabhat returned, asking:
So are you saying that other than the information edge from knowing the game state earlier, there is no edge at all in sports betting?
Apologies if I'm getting you wrong, but from what you said that necessarily follows, since all the data is visible in pretty much every major sport. Not agreeing or disagreeing for the moment, just trying to establish whether that's what you think.
Prabhat's question is probably for James, so next time he stops by, he can perhaps reply.

For my part, I'd say that sports trading and sports betting (bet and forget), are two different beasts, and if you trade in a market where court-siders are present, you are unlikely to be able to find an edge, because as stated previously, your ability to do this depends on the early-bird not seeing the worm. 

When it comes to sports "betting", I'd say choose your markets carefully.

James is right when he says:
You can analyse an up-coming match and place a bet on it but all the data is public so there is probably not going to be any edge.
However, not all markets are subjected to the same level of scrutiny, at least not yet.  

Wednesday 25 January 2017


Despite my best efforts to bring clarity and logic to the issue of court-siders, some people continue to not quite grasp the logic, or perhaps not want to grasp the logic, with Prabhat writing:

I'm a little unclear what the claim is with regarding to court-siding and the lack of an edge.
Betting on tennis, your edge can presumably come from the following factors:

a) Better understanding of the relative strength of the players. (This is where you admit there can be an edge).
b) Better understanding of (a) with respect to given situations. I.E. How likely is Wawrinka (or a generic player) to make a comeback two sets down vs Federer (or a generic player). I'm not sure whether or not you think there can be an edge here.
c) Better knowledge of what is actually going on. (This is court-siding). AKA average mug thinks score is 30-40 or 40-30, courtsider knows it's 30-40 and is betting accordingly.
I am extremely unclear on why
a) The courtsiders edge persists during a changeover when everyone knows the score.


b) Why you are absolutely positive that a court-siders temporary information advantage is so strong to nullify all analytical edge anyone might have.

I am not saying it can't be. I'm just saying I don't see where you have made this case clearly.
Your analogy is betting on the colour of the next car against a guy 100 yards ahead of you on the road. My question is if you'r betting on "more black cars than blue in the next 1000" why would a guy ahead on the road have such a huge edge compared to someone who's studied traffic distribution patterns?
Fortunately James is here with an extremely clear and concise response (much more of this, and I'll need to add James to the payroll):
You might be confusing betting and trading. I apologise, if you are not.
You can analyse an up-coming match and place a bet on it but all the data is public so there is probably not going to be any edge.
When trading in-play new information is being created all the time and you need to be the first to get that information to trade it with an edge.
Yes, at the changeover, the playing-field is level but then you are back to the betting problem and all information being public.

There will be the ill-informed who are wading into the market with daft ideas and you need to be fast to grab their volume before the professional set-ups.

I shall discuss some of this in my next article.
We look forward to that next article. I'd add that when I read Prabhat's comment, it seemed like he felt the court-siding syndicates bet ONLY based on what they were seeing, but this is not the case. I may have been influenced by Prabhat's views in June 2014, when he wrote:
As far as better analysis is concerned, what I mean is that some people will be better at analyzing data at the end-of the day than others. True, some financial data will reach big players before others and thus be 'old', but unless those big players are analyzing it perfectly, the fact that they get data in advance isn't going to result in the market automatically 'digesting it'.
That's a very optimistic, but unrealistic, viewpoint. The court-siding syndicates will have "studied traffic distribution patterns" at least as thoroughly as you have, probably more so, and since they are likely to have more resources than the individual, you're not going to have an edge here either. Do you really believe you know the probabilities for a Wawrinka comeback v Federer from two sets down better than everyone else?  

The idea that these groups are paying good money to gain an advantage that they then waste by not knowing what to do with it, just doesn't stand up to close scrutiny. This idea is as illogical today as it was back in mid-2014. 

Hopefully Prabhat, and everyone else, is clear now. This topic has certainly been good for the hit count.

Tuesday 24 January 2017

Click Bait

The hits keep coming. G, possibly not his full name, wrote:
Have to say the recent blog posts regarding the world class sports traders (Sir's Webb & Berry) have made for cracking reading but I do worry that you may be "due a visit" soon.
I do wonder why you have them on your blog roll though & I find the temptation to click on their links often too hard to resist.
Only yesterday I was seduced (nay-hypnotised) by Sir Caan's WOM headline and the next thing I know WOM makes perfect sense, my ebook was delivered in the blink of an eye and I'm awake at 2:00AM trading the AUS open- it's so easy. All this court-siding nonsense of which you speak I never even noticed. Unfortunately I don't think I'm allowed to forward on the ebook to you but not to worry I plan on delivering an online tennis trading masterclass before Wimbledon starts- it'll be called Sultan2  Anyway keep up the great blog- it's better than ever and I've been following for a good few years.
The standard of witty comments, albeit with their serious points, appears to be reaching new highs these days. Incidentally, a more professionally written post on WOM is here

G raises a good point about my having the blogs of Messrs Caan and Webb included on my blogroll, and while it's something I've thought about doing previously but gone no further, it's probably hypocritical of me to keep them there. 

Their presence implies approval, not to mention that both blogs are unusual in that neither one reciprocates and links to other blogs as is typical. One can only wonder why that might be. Surely the opinions of others are not something that world class traders should be concerned about?

Anyway, a great comment, and the kind words are appreciated. "Better than ever!" Did you see that James? 

James probably has, and here is a comment he posted which I had missed, replying to Tennis Trader's statement:
so in your belief all inplay sports betting is dead then
in a far more eloquent way than I could muster, as might be expected from a best-selling author. James writes:
A sensible trader is a logical trader.
When attacking a trading problem the first thing I think about is market structure; how the exchange, bet type and actors on the exchange behave, so that I can search for edge.
If there are actors who have time advantage over me and are consistently first to market then I am not going to consider fundamental trading in-play because court-siders are getting the fundamentals afore me.
However, if there are a significant number of misinformed and misguided traders who suck it in from the vendors then I might consider a contrarian technical approach that takes advantage of mug punter overreactions.
The perfect market is one where all actors have perfect information and can act on it instantaneously. The result of that is nobody profits apart from the exchange. As far as court-siding is concerned that particular market is considered to be perfect by sensible traders who are not courtside. It is a matter of court-siders competing amongst themselves for mug money until such time that mug punters become better informed, stop trading in-play and the paradox of skill wipes out profitability for court-siders.
In other areas, it is a matter of hoping that enough mug punters armed with simplistic vendor strategies are available to compensate your activities.
You must always assume that the best traders are not stupid and the more of them there are then the less profit there is to share amongst them, which is the nature of a zero-sum (actually, slightly negative-sum) game.
Sports trading differs from financial trading in that sports traders cannot create money from nowhere (How financial traders create money is another story). Sports trading always relies on the misinformed being willing to give away their money to the informed.
I think I might have phrased that last sentence slightly differently, perhaps - Long-term profitable sports trading relies on the willingness of the less-informed to compete with the better informed. 

The less-informed shouldn't be aware that they are less-informed, else they are not sensible. Who are they?

The less-informed may be gambling for entertainment, and couldn't care less about losing money.

The less-informed may have a gambling problem.  

The less-informed may be new to sports trading, and blissfully unaware that the game is unfair because they haven't done their research. They've hit on a couple of blogs that make winning seem so easy and dived right in, hopefully with cash they can afford to lose. A sensible trader will learn and stop. 

Or they may suffer from the Dunning-Kruger effect:
If you’re incompetent, you can’t know you’re incompetent. The skills you need to produce a right answer are exactly the skills you need to recognize what a right answer is.
Via email, I had a cheeky reply from Andy to my question:
Would you bet on the colour of the next car to pass your front door against someone positioned 300 yards up the road?
Andy: Surely that's a yes every time? If however they were positioned 300 yards down the road it would be a different matter...............for me anyway...

There's always one. 

Monday 23 January 2017

All Dead

A couple of comments on recent posts, with James first confirming that:

Caan has most certainly been a sales director.
However, selling PDFs as non-returnable digital media on PayPal has proven more lucrative than selling solar panels with their annoying money-back guarantees.
James is correct, as usual. Caan Berry lasted just shy of 9 months in 2015 (January to October) as a Sales Director before focusing on his "Retail sale via mail order houses or via Internet" company called Sports Investments (UK) Ltd. 

Tennis Trader had a comment on my post pointing out that the huge advantage for court-siders does not stop between points:
so in your belief all inplay sports betting is dead then
That statement represents quite a leap, and with a few problems - asserting a claim I have never made, and without a definition of what 'dead' means in this context.

Despite the absence of a question mark, I suspect the statement is intended as an interrogative one, but I can't speak to "all" in-play sports betting because I am not familiar with all of them. 

What I can say is that over the years, in-play betting has become 'dead' (very little activity) in some sports, for example ice hockey, College Football and baseball, and 'dead to me' (the presence of court-siders meaning I would be trading with a long-term negative expectancy) in sports such as golf, NBA and the NFL.

Football continues to attract lots of in-play money, as the 'active management' feature makes this this a unique sport on the exchanges. Here the challenge for the novice is not (usually) the presence of pitch-siders, but the standard of competition and expertise that you are up against. 

What the situation is for the many sports of which I have no experience, e.g. Aussie Rules, athletics, bowls, boxing etc., I have no idea, but any sport with enough liquidity will sooner or later become a target of court-siding syndicates.  

And at that point the smart trader will walk away. There will always be the more vulnerable and naïve who continue to unrealistically think they can compete with court-siders, but as I have explained in recent posts, this is an irrational belief, and it is irresponsible for anyone to claim otherwise. 

Would you bet on the colour of the next car to pass your front door against someone positioned 300 yards up the road? 

Of course you wouldn't, no one wants "to be picked off", even if there's encouragement to do so because it can be lucrative "...if you only bet between speed bumps". That the encouragement comes from the hot dog seller parked outside your house who used to sell to you should be a red flag.    

Sunday 22 January 2017

Missing The Point

Although still falling well short of a logical explanation of how novice tennis traders can overcome the presence of court-siders, Peter Webb does at least finally acknowledge their existence in his latest attempt at luring the less sophisticated into the dangerous waters of in-play trading.

People don’t want to be picked off by people with faster feeds. So the money vanishes as the ball is about to be played. Fire up a market and watch yourself. Nobody plays ball when the ball is being played, which is quite sensible.
Therefore most Tennis traders will trade game to game, break to break or between key points.
Unfortunately what this advice fails to point out is that court-siders will be aware of when a point, game or set is over well ahead of anyone trading from their home. 

Does Peter think that the several seconds advantage, bought at considerable expense, is not going to be utilised? That the playing field suddenly becomes level for all?

To be clear, you will know that a point has ended by looking at the Betfair markets, not when you see it on your TV. The post-point prices available to you are those offered by traders who are ahead of you, and the value is to them, not to you.

As soon as the point is over, they put bids and asks into the market either side of the new "true" price.

Unless you (illogically) think that your skills can somehow be sharper than those of traders who are involved in tennis markets all the time, then if you are trading tennis in-play, whether between points or between games, you are consistently betting with a negative long-term expectancy.

Anyone who implies otherwise is being disingenuous.     

Friday 20 January 2017

Turning Worms

A busy day for the blog yesterday with a year high 2k visitors stopping by, a figure boosted by one reader who let me know via Twitter that he is reading the blog from start to finish.

A few comments, starting with this one from James, who wrote:
Excellent post. How long before the first irate fan boy turns up to defend their masters?
It's rather bold of Caan to be asking his readership which car he should buy with their money.
Imagine a mugger asking his victim if he should buy an iPhone or an iPad with the contents of their wallet.
No wonder Caan doesn't sell his wares through Amazon. Instead, opting to sell only through his website with no chance of a refund through PayPal, if the PDF or video turns out not to be up to scratch.
All to be expected from a pair of characters who started their careers in sales and marketing and appear not to have left it.
Bet Angel is decent enough software for manual trading (whilst such activity lasts), although Advanced Cymatic Trader is just as good but much cheaper. I just wish Webby would stop making out that it's a money printing machine that anyone can operate, which it plainly isn't.
Caan is just the sports trading equivalent of Jordan Belfort, a motivational speaker and nothing else. His blog posts are vacuous and often semi-literate, which probably hits the right level for his readership.
Sidney James. Somewhere Up The Khyber Pass. Fworrrr! Nyah. Nyah. Nyah!
I actually thought that Caan started his 'career' in the Army, followed by a spell with BT as a fibre optic engineer, and support for that opinion comes from the second comment from ProTrader2017 who not only knows his way around trading software but is also highly amusing and well worth a read. i wish I'd written it myself:
Some wit from James, what's the world coming too!
I was discussing the various Betfair 'pros' with a fellow trader recently and we both came to the conclusion they all seem to be aligned as 'star strikers' for the various software sellers. Hard to know if this is by design or just one of those quirks that each team's striker is also representative of the team they support ;)
Adam Heathcote set the community, and BetAngel fortunes?, alight with his rise to fame and fortune but then disappeared after the failure of Exchange Secrets, possibly too secret that nobody fell for it. Was Adam too 'wet' to represent BetAngel, had just played his part or taking the limelight from the owner? Either way it left an opening up front for the happy go lucky and reliable balding uncle Peter to fill the position. Peter likes to play on his stable financial background and regales us of his business meetings in the USA possibly aiming for a more discerning crowd. Every now and then we get the odd (shill?) poster no longer satisfied with his fortune as a stock market trader and asks if his skills would be transferable as a sports trader.
As if he even needed to ask, of course the answer is a big YES from me, and me, and me, as the forum eggs him on to even greater riches and freedom.
The 'Wimbledon' of the trading world seems to be the maverick GeeksToy squad who aim for a completely different demographic relying mainly on ex-army 'grunt' Caan Berry as their main striker. Ain't got no education, just works and plays hard to reap those rewards of fancy cars and flash holidays. All backed up by fancy websites and once only offers of free geekstoy subscriptions with every ebook. Hard to imagine Caan coding and setting up a website but I suppose if the club owner is a web programmer it's not that hard. Geekstoy also have a reserve striker in the form of little known Jack Birhead who also regales us of fancy holidays in Barcelona from his grans bedsit somewhere ooop north.
Lower down the divisions we have the once mighty Racing Traders whose fortunes have dwindled and now have to rely on the 'abilities' of the straight talking aussie 'The Badger', so good he even has his own nickname. And finally the relegation fodder, Gruss, whose star striker AintItaRightMugsGame is an ex Betangel player, obviously not good enough to make the first team and passed to Gruss on a free transfer. Luckily for ItsAMug his council estate in Coventry is in the Midlands where the Gruss founders are conveniently based so he can always pop around to borrow a cup of sugar if there's ever a lull in the activity on the busy Gruss Forum.
On a side note I just noticed not everyone is swallowing the hype and someone's pointed out a lot of old 'sleeper' shill? accounts have come out to cheer on the team in this hour of need.
"by SeaHorseRacing » Fri Jan 20, 2017 11:42 am
This thread is turning into a wakening of the dead. :lol:
Some old timers back it appears?"

Well I never, have the worms finally turned?
Brilliant stuff. 

If ProTrader2017 doesn't have his own blog but would like to contribute to this one from time to time, he's very welcome.

A couple of comments on the above, first and foremost, balding is a sign of maturity and experience and enables the top of the head to function as a solar powered love panel. The expensive girlfriends love it, or perhaps it's the villa, pool, and expensive sports car they love. Just don't tell my wife. 

I have no real familiarity with Bet Angel, Geek's Toy or Gruss, but there are some great evocative descriptions in the comment above. 

With rare exception, the barriers to entry into the financial markets include a decent education, and thus sports betting is where the less educated tend to end up. Webby's education in English and Mathematics appears to have stopped at puberty, and Caan's grammar is similarly woeful. 

This is not to say that there aren't some smart people trading sports, although it appears to help if your initials are JB with Joseph Buchdahl and James Butler to the fore. 

Despite having the requisite initials, Joe Bloggs is not so smart, leaving school with few qualifications and often joining the military before leaving to live "in Grandma's bedsit" or on a council estate somewhere where they stumble across Betfair and for no logical reason whatsoever, decide they have a rare talent for trading. 

Unrealistic blogs and vendor blogs are partly responsible here, encouraging the naïve to skim over the question of how they might have an edge over others far better qualified or experienced or with earlier access to information. 

The overriding message is "Don't worry about that - just buy my software, ebook, trading class and join the rest of us who are all making fortunes".

James had a response to ProTrader2017's comment, writing:
"Some wit"? How dare you?
You encapsulated the state of play rather well.
That's you marked for life then. ;) Welcome to the club.

I hope Uncle Peter doesn't have your email address otherwise you'll be getting the treatment. I keep copies for those nights when I struggle to sleep.
Finally, speaking of earlier access to information, the screenshot below showed up in my Twitter timeline yesterday:

Not the easiest to read, and I don't care tuppence for horse racing, but I doubt that too many traders were using the feed from At The Races. I have no precise numbers for the time delay for pictures from Melbourne to the UK, but imagine it is well over eight seconds. In the absence of any explanation from Webby or Caan as to how this significant disadvantage can be overcome, I'd suggest not entering the ring. Anyone happen to know how Australian Open trading volumes are this year compared to prior? 

Thursday 19 January 2017

Making Up For Deficiencies

Robbo the trader suggested that:
Whilst you and snidey James pontificate 'it can't be done' traders like Peter and Caan rake in in the dosh, kerchinnnng.
I'll let James respond first before I add my thoughts. James replies:
Whilst the acolytes work themselves into a frenzy over the latest post or video by Sir Peter or Sir Caan, Cassini and Snidey James (I thought it was Sydney James, nevermind) don't say "It can't be done" they say, "It is not as easy as Sir makes you think it is."
We (and other realists such as Joseph Buchdahl) tell the truth about betting and trading. Others create an illusion for you to lap up because their real incomes depend on you being taken in by the simplicity of what they say.
I don't see any real evidence that either of them trade that much. Do you have such evidence?
It's Big Pairs again. If I owned a 7 figure software subscription business I wouldn't waste my time sports trading.
Obviously, trading is not that easy otherwise you wouldn't have posted your comment. You'd be getting it quietly.
As James states, no one has ever, at least to the best of my knowledge, stated that "it can't be done", but in this era of court-siding, I am of the opinion that trading tennis is about the unlikeliest place where a novice is likely to find an edge, and where even more experienced traders will struggle to break-even long term competing at such a disadvantage. 

If Robbo, Webby, Caan or anyone else can come up with any kind of logical reasoning explaining how a long-term advantage can be obtained in a market where others have a significant advantage, I'd love to hear it. 

A comment from a Steve on Caan's own blog back in July 2014 pretty much sums up my thoughts:
You’re all acting as if these are unchartered waters, tennis is one of those sports that is probably more automated than any other with plenty of teams botting the markets using very sophisticated stats based software. Surely the recent courtsiding legal issues should have shown you that.
The markets are very efficient and driven by probabilities, stats dictate what the prices should be, overall they earn the operators fortunes by being more informed than the majority. Of course there are chinks in their armour and they’re happy to leak a few quid here and there on the basis the majority will pay it back with interest. Just don’t go in assuming because you’ve come out on top in a few markets you’ve cracked the tennis because you can be pretty sure someone’s put in a lot more effort to crack it.
Interesting that Steve's comment was the final one on that post, as if everyone reading it suddenly realised how silly they were. Well, at least for a few minutes. 

As for whether Webby or Caan are 'raking in the dosh' from trading tennis, only they know. That Webby hasn't mentioned the Premium Charge in over five years may be a reflection of a reduction in trading activity in general, and if Caan's making money, he's not acting very maturely with it:
So its been a while since I treated myself to a new car.. In fact I seem to do it once a year and you may remember a couple of years back I bought a pretty sporty Astra which was pretty new at the time, it managed to cost me a small fortune in the space of a year so I got rid of it. I want a new car now although, I don’t want the same happening to me again. I like cars although haven’t much of a clue whats best to be looking at so I thought some of you might be able to help me out!

Ideally I want to get a new Porsche Cayman GTS although with a near on £60,000 price tag its going to have to wait as the money will be better spent on getting a house and living rent free initially. In the mean time though I wouldn’t mind a change. Currently im driving a BMW 325 which I actually rate quite well, excluding the fuel consumption that is. I have to drive a considerable distance each time I have my son so long-term it’s not a great idea, plus I’d like something a little more sporty. I think its important to treat yourself every now and then too as it boosts that motivation to kick on…
Admittedly Caan is very young, but if buying a new car every year is what it takes to "boost that motivation to kick on", I'd seek professional help. From the always reliable Daily Mail:
The old adage goes that a man driving a big car is compensating for something - and according to the latest research, there might be some truth in it.
A new survey asked sports car drivers, as well as their partners, about the size of their nether regions, and - as expected - they got wildly different answers.
The results seemed to suggest that people who buy big, flashy cars are indeed making up for deficiencies in the trouser department.
Perhaps, but buying a new car is a waste of money in my opinion. Buy one that's a year old, that has taken the depreciation hit, and still has a warranty and thousands of miles ahead of it.

James suggests that "Obviously, trading is not that easy otherwise you wouldn't have posted your comment. You'd be getting it quietly" and there's a lot of truth to this idea. 

In my experience, mature, successful people in general tend not to feel the need to tell everyone about how successful they are. 

When was the last time you saw an ad for Rolls Royce? It's not a coincidence that when selling a 'product' related to gambling, an expensive car, exotic location, big house and swimming pool seem to be 'must-haves', which speaks volumes for the target audience I guess. Hinting at a few hot babes throwing themselves at you surely can't hurt either:
Back to James' comment, and of course it makes no sense for Webby to waste his time trading when the money to be made is in selling software. It makes sense to write about how impossible it is to lose when using that software, but there's an opportunity cost to actually trading, especially if you have been successful in the past and have reached Super Premium Charges.

I am heading out for the evening now in my brand new Koenigsegg CCXR Trevita now to get wasted with a few expensive girlfriends, before returning home to my villa, where after a quick swim in my pool, I shall turn on the TV and trade the Australian Open. 

Wednesday 18 January 2017

The Seirenes

One comment on my Australian Open Tennis Tip post which comes from best selling author James, who took a break from writing his next book "Reverse Portuguese Calculus" which promises to be a page-turner.

He wrote:
I too noticed Mr Poolside and Webby discussing the Australian Open on their blogs. A little winter filler, something to say, to let their acolytes know they are still thinking of them.
In Webby's blog he added the ability to get live scores direct from the umpire's chair. But you still need visuals for an edge and only a court-sider will be seeing the action live.
I doubt that either of these two will be trading the tennis. Maybe a little to get a video of their genius. Assuming they profit, otherwise the video gets deleted. An exercise in survivorship bias.
Still, the acolytes will get taken in.
Of course, we should expect a winning video from Webby. After all, you'd be an idiot not to profit in the curious positive-sum trading market that is tennis. (Of course, we shouldn't really call any trading zero-sum when you factor in commission and other costs.)
And yet the acolytes take the rubbish that these two write as the gospel truth and never question it. "I don't need to test anything. Sir says it is possible so I am going to throw myself into this without a strategy. If I fail then it's because I was stupid and was not doing what Sir told me to do."
I have looked at tennis, decided it was an interesting mathematical exercise (Markov model) but that I would need a syndicate to make it work. And, even then, I might step on toes and get more than I bargain for.
Tennis is an interesting sport for mathematical analysis between matches, but not so much when games are in-play. 
Anyone For First Round Grand Slam Favourites?
If you have a system that, for example, is triggered on a 15:30 score, someone else sees that score reached before you do, and will have taken any bets that represented value.

"Live scores" are never "live" and while they might fill a need for an avid tennis fan, from a betting perspective I'd suggest they are worse than useless. I say worse, because they can encourage an unsophisticated gambler to play in a market they have no business playing in. 

James' comment encouraged me to be brave and take a look at Peter Webb's post on the Australian Open, and as James hinted at, it is full of fluff about how great a sport tennis is for trading, 
January is when the Tennis season starts up again and it’s a good the year is a great time to get some Tennis trading experience under your belt. With weaker markets elsewhere, the Australian Open is a great time to get going on Tennis.
Unfortunately the post is devoid of any substance whatsoever. It's a vendor blog of course, and the usual errors such as "And it's a good the year" and "he feel ill" shows a concerning lack of attention to detail which should make readers a little wary, but other than sloppy writing, is there anything useful or fully transparent in the fluff surrounding the unsubtle sales pitch?

The answer is not really. Perhaps Webby genuinely thinks the below comments are 'advice', but to me and anyone with just a few functioning brain cells, they are at best up there with 'stay hydrated', at worst deliberately misleading.
Through really in-depth research you can find a lot of really useful things

Don’t forget that it’s summer in Melbourne and that heat has often been a factor

The time difference in Australia can pose a problem for trading
Find key points within a match to trade from
It would be nice to see a disclaimer saying something like "of course, all the software in the world won't help you when others are maybe a point ahead of you" but such honesty isn't going to sell anything. 

Another look at Caan Berry's post, which bears remarkable similarities to Webbo's it must said, and you'll see this:
During this period I like to reflect a little, review and learn from mistakes. Gain any knowledge I can that’ll help in the coming months. But after a couple of years doing this I realised I was missing a trick… tennis. Like I said above, time-zones aren’t brill but January offers an interesting opportunity in the tennis markets. And so; the Australian Open isn’t just for tennis traders!
The trick, apparently, is to sound very deep, serious and philosophical, before announcing that the outcome of your months of solitude and meditation is.... wait for it.... to trade tennis, which offers an "interesting" opportunity (whatever that means - why is a tennis market any more interesting than the FTSE or Pork Bellies?) 

And "sothe Australian Open isn't just for tennis traders!" Wait. What? So everyone can have an edge? Count me in. How do I gain an edge? Obviously I don't want to sign up and simply hand over my money. Turns out the answer is easy:
Finding one of these points where the market is as it’s most compact, along with a particular personal trend in behaviour (from a player) is the perfect opportunity. The only downside being; you might have to watch a load of tennis before the opportunity presents itself. 
I'm not sure what "is as it's most compact" means, but that's because I must be the idiot. May I ask here why the tennis specialists wouldn't have noticed these 'personal trends in behaviour' ahead of me? Just a thought. I don't mean to be difficult.
In short, the key to winning for any would-be tennis trader is to know where the market (and players) strengths and weaknesses are. And then deploying with our old-friend discipline!
Wow, this is easy. Again though, are these specialists actually mentally challenged? I mean, wouldn't they know far more about players' strengths and weaknesses than myself? Just a thought. Not meaning to be difficult.
One of the most positive things about tennis is; you can really stake up when you find a solid opportunity, and generally, the market will take it.
Only a cynic would suggest that a solid opportunity would have long gone before a novice / non-court-sider would have become aware of it. If the market is taking your money, be afraid, be very afraid.

My thoughts on tennis trading are not new, but no one, not even Mr Poolside or Webby (as James refers to them), has ever put forward an explanation of how exactly traders are expected to overcome the advantage of court-siders in the long term. I'm not holding my breath. 

Seirenes: The Sirens were beautiful but dangerous creatures that lured the sailors with their beautiful voices to their doom, causing the ships to crash on the reefs near their island.